Wednesday, August 29, 2012

The Andean Parliament vs The Nordic Parliament on Court of Monarchs and Structures on Organized Crime

SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online
vol.25 issue74BACK ON THE CAMPAIGN OF SOLIDARITY WITH THE VICTIMS OF PORTETE BAY:: AN ETHNOGRAPHIC STUDY OF TRANSNATIONAL ACTIVISM (2006-2007)ON WATER MANAGEMENT IN THE CONTEMPORARY WORLD. A BIOPOLITICAL APPROACH author indexsubject indexarticles search Home Pagealphabetic serial listing

Análisis Político

Print version ISSN 0121-4705

Abstract

BLANCO ALVARADO, Carolina. DECISIONS ANDEAN PARLIAMENT: UTOPIA OR REALITY LEGAL?. anal.polit. [online]. 2012, vol.25, n.74, pp. 93-108. ISSN 0121-4705.
The Cartagena Agreement is a treaty framework in which its rules can not cover positive whole complex picture and progressive development through a process of integration. The incomplete nature of this standard require that, for purposes of execution accomplished, whether developed of supplemented. It is an that context that Community bodies such as the Andean Parliament, the full importance in the Andean integration process, which since Article 42 of the Cartagena. Agreement defines as the governing body of the System whit communal nature and theoretically with legislative powers in matters within is competence. This article aims to analyze the influence of the issued by the Andean Parliament in the Andean states and the organs and institutions of the Andean Integration System (SAI) under the powers assigned to the international body for the agreement of Cartagena. In this vein, they examine the nature of the decisions of the Andean Parliament, the basis on which the decisions of the Andean Parliament do not produce the desired effects, concluding with some proposals that could achieve obligator Decisions of that international body.
Keywords : Decision of the Andean Parliament; the legal system of member countries; law Andean Integration; the Andean Integration System (SAI).

No comments:

Post a Comment

Followers

Blog Archive